Saturday, September 15, 2012

Why One Adjunct is About to Quit

To accompany Dana's post immediately below, and the story on the CSU ad debacle of a few days ago, here's a post from Adjunctorium describing why the author is about to stop working as an adjunct. She's admittedly an atypical adjunct: end-of-career rather than early-, with full-time experience that she's successfully parlaying into a business of her own after losing her full-time job to cutbacks.  Also, she admits here to employing others to grade papers in her comp classes, a practice with which I have both ethical and pedagogical issues (in comp classes, providing feedback on papers is, in my opinion, a big part of what constitutes "teaching," and is also how one keeps abreast of where students are and where they need to be.  Classes that are created, taught, and, yes, graded by the same person are higher-quality than more standardized ones for exactly this reason).  And she sounds pretty burnt-out and frustrated with teaching freshman comp, which is probably a good reason to quit in and of itself.  Still, she makes some good points, especially this one:

Something called “opportunity cost” attaches to the various activities we engage. The theory behind opportunity cost is that if you could be using your time to do X for a certain amount of money but instead you spend your time doing Y for less money (or even for free), then the second activity is costing you money by occupying time that could be used more productively.
This is true of adjunct teaching, with a vengeance. The job is paid so poorly to begin with, and then so much extra unpaid labor is demanded, that the actual per-hour pay rate is down around minimum wage. . . .
For chrissake. Anyone with a master’s or a doctorate should be able to convert his or her skills into a marketable service. And if you can’t, for heaven’s sake go back to school yourself and get a marketable AA in a trade! You’ll do better in almost any low-income job than you’ll ever do teaching adjunct.
The full post is here.

P.S.  It occurs to me that if this woman and Bubba put their heads together, they just might come up with something profitable, if not, perhaps, all that pedagogically sound.  But whether anybody (at least anybody with any real power) actually wants pedagogically sound is an open question.

4 comments:

  1. I think the underlying problem with adjuncting (aside from the obvious institutional disadvantages and slave labor) is implied in this post: people must market themselves. I've mentioned here before that I am doing a balancing act after I had to follow my partner when he got an Ivy job. I'm adjuncting, connected to 3 different institutions (two f2f, one online).

    But that's not all I do. I am a research fellow. I'm on some committees. I've just been asked to travel abroad to do research paid by the country I am visiting. I volunteer all the time, at schools both high school and college. I do peer evals for a journal whose editors live at the Uni down the road.

    Time is always an issue, of course, but I think adjuncting is a stone that drags you down to drown. The other opportunities -- researching, networking, online material -- this is what gives you buoyancy, what enables you to float in spite of the stone tied to your feet.

    Also, to continue that metaphor, you cannot counteract the stone for ever. Never stay in an adjunct position for more than 3 years. If you've gotten to that point, even at a job you enjoy but does not pay you enough, you must leave. You must reinvent. You must start over.

    If you don't, you'll drown. You'll have nothing to show except an empty bank account and years of sacrifice.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Having a deadline, and an escape plan, definitely helped me through my own period of patching together insufficient work - I was one of the incredibly lucky ones and I got an academic job (after only applying for around 100 of them!) within 18 months, but even in that short time frame, some mornings I really needed to be able to tell myself it wasn't going to go on forever.

    Would I have actually gone? I don't know. But I do know that I was actually felling quite excited by some of the options I had found...

    ReplyDelete
  3. Having a deadline, and an escape plan, definitely helped me through my own period of patching together insufficient work - I was one of the incredibly lucky ones and I got an academic job (after only applying for around 100 of them!) within 18 months, but even in that short time frame, some mornings I really needed to be able to tell myself it wasn't going to go on forever.

    Would I have actually gone? I don't know. But I do know that I was actually felling quite excited by some of the options I had found...

    ReplyDelete
  4. What Grumpy said twice -- that was me, only for 5 years. But I wouldn't do 5 years if I hadn't gotten my Ph.D. so young. An deadline and an escape plan are KEY.

    ReplyDelete

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.