Here's some flava:
If you’re genuinely interested in a critique of Black Studies (or similarly constructed interdisciplinary or identity-based programs of study), don’t give into the temptation of making a martyr out of a blogger whose real mistake was a lack of intellectual rigor or standards and then a proud defense of lacking intellectual rigor or standards. I shouldn’t have to tell social conservatives in particular to avoid playing the victim card. Do the time if you really think that critique is necessary, useful or important: read the work (short and long) that will let you have some substantive ownership over that critique. If you’re willing to roll up your sleeves and work a bit, I think you’ll find that there are important criticisms of Black Studies as field within the field and outside of it, by white authors and black authors alike.and here's the link.
Well sure, yeah, any decent field involves meta-critique without the corollary that it should not exist. How many people would argue that because older ideas in biology have been superseded by new ones, or that biology has grounded some absolutely reprehensible political projects, that the entire discipline ought to be shut down?
ReplyDeleteIndeed. I think that was Burke's point in posting the list: this is a real, grown-up discipline, with intradisciplinary debates, and examination of assumptions and all that good stuff. Shouldn't really need to be said, but apparently it does.
DeleteOops, excuse my two "thats."
ReplyDeleteThank you. That's a blog I follow occasionally, too.
ReplyDelete