Getting the night course is the cost of never being asked to teach before ten in the morning, so I won't complain about that.
After a little bit of horse-trading everyone agreed that it was as good and fair a schedule as could be made within the constraints we face and there was at least a little rejoicing.
Then summer was upon us and I started trying to schedule my TBA. Various students sent me various ridiculously constrained schedules and I mailed them back asking for clarification and generally finding the places where they actually could come to class and just didn't want to. And a few students persistently didn't answer their emails, so I looked up their class schedules and assumed that anytime they weren't in someone else's class they could come to mine. Eventually I chose and
published a time and ignored the resulting complaints from people who hadn't communicated with me during earlier rounds of negotiation.
As the summer semester ended (glorious extra pay warring with crammed days for the most notable feature of that period), I turned my attention to writing schedules and preparing assignments for the fall.
Then, with less than a week to go, the email showed up.
The mail telling us how Professor Formal was having trouble getting her visa to return from seeing her relatives in the old country, and we were all facing schedule changes. The chair had to rope in a couple of occasional adjuncts to cover the service sections, but it could be done.
It wasn't too bad for me, I lost that five-day-a-week service class and got Professor Formal's section of Intro Hamsterology for Majors (a course I've been wanting to teach) and consequently another hour of overload pay and a huge headache preping a new course in four days and re-scheduling my TBA.
So Fall was a little rocky at the start, but as week two drew to a close I had gotten my feet under me and all my classes seemed likely to be a little better than average.
Then the visa came through.
Another email. More re-scheduling.
Because our Chair is not an evil person she was determined not to pull any sections out from under adjuncts, but that meant snagging what units she could from full-time faculty. The resulting schedules are strange and I've lost all my overload hours, and will have an awkward hole in my schedule starting week seven (from historical reason our first "for-majors" class is split into a 6- and 10-week sessions).
I had plans for that money, but maybe I can use those hours for a little research. Or am I being an optimist again?
You're being an optimist.ReplyDelete
I've never seen anything like that. It's ... I'm at a loss for useful words.
Oy. I've never heard of a TBA class, though I can see the logic for working things that way (though I can also see lots of potential for headaches on the proffie's part and unhappiness on the students' part and suchlike. It seems at the very least no worse to take some combination of historical and current data, schedule a section, and cross all available appendages that it will fill).ReplyDelete
I can also understand the visa complications. Sadly, it's all too believable that a process that went smoothly in the past didn't work as efficiently this time.
And it sounds like your chair did, indeed, behave very decently to the adjuncts, which is, sadly (again), a rarity.
It sounds like the main thing missing here is sufficient funding to remove the extra dimension of overloads from the already-complex process of scheduling (while still paying faculty decently), *and* to allow for enough flexibility to allow a professor who encounters a visa problem to do some sort of non-teaching work for a while, or some other sort of work-around that treats the faculty and students involved as something other than sardines to be crammed into any available can, any way they (sort of) fit.
For all that it has cost me this time around, I treasure the fact that my chair is a decent human being. Not just taking care of the adjuncts, but also saying "Oh, you're a night person. We can work with that.", and polling us about the classes that make it worth teaching and trying to see that everyone gets one of those each semester.Delete
The funding issue is almost built in. We're a directional state school, and we charge only slightly more per credit hour than the junior colleges down the road (but a few dollars less than our big competitor just over the state line).
The TBA scheduling is because, funding being what it is, the dean actually means it when he says you have to have six students to run it. So the worry of making those schedules work comes second to getting people signed up in the first place. I suspect it was the Dean who put down his foot about how much non-teaching work would be tolerated, too, and again I can only complain so much because money really is tight.
The thing that hurts most is rawhiding for three days to be ready for a class and then only getting to teach the first third of it.
Just because there's no malice afoot doesn't mean it's not genuine misery. What a pain for you and for your students.ReplyDelete
That's the heart of it. The older I get, and the more I learn about all the various forces, internal and external, that shape the current situation in higher ed, the less I'm inclined to see malice/villains (and, sadly -- again -- the less I'm inclined to see any easy, or even difficult-but-possible, solutions. The whole thing really is quite a mess, one that was a long time in the making, and will be a long time -- if ever -- in the unraveling)Delete