Wednesday, October 3, 2012

Twelve

The place on a college campus where you can find the highest concentration of laziness, stupidity, and cluelessness isn’t in the president’s office, or the dean’s office, or the office of that old tenured guy that’s using the same notes to teach Paradise Lost as he did in 1972.  The place on a college campus where you can find the highest concentration laziness, stupidity, and cluelessness isn’t really a “place” at all.  It’s the roster of a core course taught online.  I won’t go into detail why.  Because we all know why. 

I have been teaching core courses online for years.  Years.  And over that time I have come to realize that the bells and whistles of the online experience—all the things that multitasking millenials love—the journals, the discussion boards, the lecture captures, the blogs, the chats, the videos, the powerpoint slides, etc.—are useless.  They are less than useless because they are distractions from real thought.  In fact, those useless distractions are the prime reason why many of them cannot think, even when they try.

So, here is what my students are dealing with in my online class.  Or rather, attempting not to deal with.  Every week they are given a bunch of shit to read.  Not only primary shit, but secondary shit that illuminates and comments on the primary shit, often from different perspectives.  The online course requires nine full hours of their time per week, spent in a place free from distractions.  Nine. Full. Hours.  Six to seven of those hours need to be spent reading the aforementioned primary and secondary shit, and taking careful notes.  Two to three of those hours need to be spent writing an essay in response to a prompt on that primary and secondary shit. 

I am available to discuss these primary and secondary sources with them, via phone, email, or an office visit, of which I often remind them.  The fact that they will not attempt to contact me is no skin of my professorial nose.  I’d personally prefer it if they didn’t, because then I can use my office hours to nap or gossip with my best friend about that lady at our church with the bad dye job that keeps thinking up more shit for us to do.  (I hate you, lady at our church with the bad dye job that keeps thinking up more shit for us to do.) But I’m there for the students in my online class.  I’m there for them.  They ignore me at their peril, but I am there for them. 

And many of them indeed are in great peril, because the essay on that primary and secondary shit will be judged on their ability to directly address the prompt.  To do this they not only need to be very familiar with the primary and secondary shit, but they will actually need to read the prompt and pay attention to it.  They don’t want to do either of these things.  They want to summarize some bullshit they read on the internet. 

But my questions cannot be answered by summarizing some bullshit they read on the internet, and if they do, even if I cannot accuse them of plagiarism because they have been clever little fucks about their thievery, I will still fail their sorry asses for not answering the fucking question.

Here is a handy list on what their grade is also NOT based on: 
  • Facebook posts on the primary source
  • Solipsistic musings in their journals on the primary source
  • Their opinion on whether or not they would date the main character in the primary source
  • Tweets from Starbucks on what they’re drinking while they’re “reading” the primary source
  • Their BFF’s opinions on the movie based on the primary source
  • Their poetry slam open-mike performance on the primary source 
  • Their invention of a role-playing game based on the primary source
  • Etc. etc. etc.
 They are not judged on anything they write about their twee little millennial imaginings, for which I have no regard whatsoever.  They are judged, purely, on their ability to interact with the texts and their ability to coherently address the question in essay form.  They do not want to do this.  It is too hard.  It requires thought.  Long periods of deep thought. And for weeks, most of them go through an unimaginable series of contortions to avoid this. 

But the day comes—it always does—that separates the men from the boys.  In the semester calendar this day is the last date to drop without receiving a WP or a WF.  They are made to understand from the beginning that I do not hand out WPs unless a student’s average is above passing, so a student that remains on my roster after that day knows they cannot easily escape.  They must think, or fail.  Think, or fail. 

Well, for this semester, that day recently passed. On the morning after, I checked the roster for my online core class, to see which names remained.  The class had begun in August with a full enrollment of thirty, and more wanting to get in.  But by the morning after the last day to drop it had shrunk from that maximum of thirty to…(drumroll please)…

Twelve.  Twelve brave souls.  Or twelve foolish ones. 

It’s too early to tell. 

11 comments:

  1. Great post; great story.

    Are there any consequences for you when the attrition rate is that high?

    Don't get me wrong: I don't think that any blame whatsoever attaches to a faculty member who upholds a proper academic standard and expects students to conform to it. But the folks in the administrative offices are sometimes not so, shall we say, understanding.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. No consequences as of yet. No one says "boo" to me about retention in my classes. And if they did, I would politely tell them to fuck off. If they persisted, I would not-so-politely tell them to fuck off.

      That's why God invented tenure.

      Delete
  2. Neil Postman was right, even though he wrote "Amusing Ourselves to Death" in 1985 and it was about television. Nevertheless, when machines do our thinking for us, it doesn't make us smarter.

    ReplyDelete
  3. I'm very new to the methods used in online learning. It's my understanding that the journal entries, discussion boards, blogs and chats are needed because it would be too easy for a student to plagiarize or pay for somebody to write four in-depth essays per semester, similar to a typical face-to-face course. Lots of writing samples provides evidence that helps a professor spot a well-written essay that may be fake. Is that true?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. That's one reason, maybe the primary one. Another important reason to have them do all this work is to mimic the discussion and activities they would do in a face-to-face class, at least in English/comp classes.

      Delete
    2. Not so sure about that mimicry!

      I cut my teeth teaching Wombat Welfare on campus but then welcomed the opportunity to move online during my own clinical training sequences. After completing the training, I continued to teach online but was eager to return to some on campus work.

      I got my wish and was SO excited to get back to the live-action give-and-take, thrust-and-parry ...

      Had I been drinking that much during my original on campus experiences?

      My recent campus time was like teaching a roomful of mannequins. My original experiences had even been in 100+ student lecture sections. Yet, during my campus reboot, classes were capped at 25 -- and after add/drop -- usually had no more than 20.

      Still, no amount of cajoling, activities, or antics could raise a pulse from them. I actually had students who skipped the midterm but still came to class to just ... sit.

      So, theoretically, all the online writing might be an attempt to replicate the on campus experience. But from what I'm hearing, being on campus is just like being online.

      Delete
    3. I don't think anyone in my classes has the scratch to pay someone to do those essays, Ben. I don't teach rich kids, and it takes a buttload of work. Plus, they have to find someone smarter than they are. There have been situations where it was obvious that a relative/friend was doing the work for a couple of weeks (because I'd had the student before and knew they weren't capable of that level of work), but that imposter gets tired pretty quick. After a couple of weeks it's sayonara and the shitty student is back to doing shitty work again.

      In addition, I have a mandatory in-class final that's worth 40% of the grade. So even if Dumbo's smarter sibling does the work all semester, unless Dumbo has an identical twin, Dumbo's going to have to produce ID and take the test himself. True distance learning students must pay for a proctor.

      Delete
    4. Dumbo and shit. Millions of hits and billions served. Menstrual synchrony and the symphony of misery.
      Even if neither Dick Tingle nor Greta creates a poem about all this flotsam and jetsam, it will emerge anyway like a phoenix from the ashes of absurdity. That is the wonder of CM.

      Delete
  4. Wait, only twelve students? I've been teaching the wrong thing! I'm switching. Now.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Oh, nevermind. I just read the rest of the blogpost. :o) Nice job! It helps to know that when I muse about how I wish I taught online, I probably don't wish that.

      Delete
  5. But...but...but you're not building class camaraderie! Or learning from your students! Or letting them learn from each other! Or making the work relevant to their lives! Or utilizing cutting-edge social media! Or adapting your assignments to a variety of learning styles! Or letting them revise until they understand what you want! You're just insisting that they engage with old-fashioned written material in the old-fashioned way, slightly adapted for the virtual environment. You're basically conducting a 19th/20th (heck, maybe 11th)-century Oxford tutorial online.

    Brava. And long may tenure protect your right (and your responsibility) to do just that.

    ReplyDelete

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.